![]() |
|
|
Acetal Reiber found that "some forms of oxidants [e.g., chlorine] are more adverse than others and cause exfoliation that weakens the structure. Because [the joints] are under tension, it causes a leak." The use of polymer acetal fittings were replaced by the use of copper or brass fittings. Polybutylene However, as early as the 1980s, leaking problems with the PB system arose. The primary cause of the leaks was assumed to be related to the acetal fittings. However, manufacturers of raw PB, including Shell Oil, Hoechst Celanese Corporation and Dupont De Nemours, blame the bulk of leaks and ruptures on improper installation. PB manufacturer spokesperson Carrie Chassin says, "The main problem has been at the joints. Some plumbers just took old brass fittings and used them for plastic -- that's one piece of the puzzle." Chassin says the makers of PB piping have corrected problems with leaks. However, with the continued rising concern with PB, Shell, HCC and DuPont formed the Consumer Plumbing Recovery Center in 1991 to deal with customer complaints. The Center was later used to handle the claims resulting from class action lawsuits brought against the manufacturers. The largest of the class action suits and one of the largest suits in U.S. history is the Cox v Shell settlement of $950 million in 1995. PB piping remains popular among many home builders because it offers savings of $200 to $600 per home compared to CPVC and copper piping. PB piping is almost the exclusive material used for plumbing in inexpensive tract houses and mobile homes. The piping itself is about half the cost of copper, but more expensive than CPVC. Major cost savings come from lower installation costs by using semi-skilled labor. Return
to the Top of the Page
|